Mar. 16, 2009, 04:58 AM
Graycode;
All you say is absolutely true.... or at least I agree with you 100%, so we're either both right or both wrong.
The sad fact is though, many (if not most) non-professional computer users have NetBios turned on, if for no other reason than Windows won't recognize any other devices within one's home network if it's not active. And if I'm not mistaken, most ISP's, or at least a fair number of them, don't bother filtering out any such "extraneous" information - it's not worth their time or bother to keep their customers from divulging private data.
And you'd think that campus (college, university, you name it) IT people would indeed try to protect their own, but not so. Nearly all of the MafIAA filings I've read (thanks to Ray Beckerman, linked above) include the MAC of the accused person(s). That's how they go for the John Doe, because as far as the cloud is concerned, the campus is just one IP address. (Albeit, a massively used one.) Without a MAC, any requests to an IT department would just get a blank stare - they dole out dynamic and static IP's by the hundreds, per hour. No way they're gonna be physically able to cooperate without that all-important MAC. Which of course just bolsters your point - it shouldn't be visible to the rest of the cloud, but it is.
RJB's site is not meant to be technically inclined, but slash dot is, of course. They've discussed this facet time and again, and so far as I can tell, no one has come up with a good reason why the above is true. I'll not get into any debate about that one, it's enough for me to know that I'm probably so far under their radar that I can safely find and d/l Duke Ellington's "Caravan" without too much fear.
Oddysey
All you say is absolutely true.... or at least I agree with you 100%, so we're either both right or both wrong.

The sad fact is though, many (if not most) non-professional computer users have NetBios turned on, if for no other reason than Windows won't recognize any other devices within one's home network if it's not active. And if I'm not mistaken, most ISP's, or at least a fair number of them, don't bother filtering out any such "extraneous" information - it's not worth their time or bother to keep their customers from divulging private data.
And you'd think that campus (college, university, you name it) IT people would indeed try to protect their own, but not so. Nearly all of the MafIAA filings I've read (thanks to Ray Beckerman, linked above) include the MAC of the accused person(s). That's how they go for the John Doe, because as far as the cloud is concerned, the campus is just one IP address. (Albeit, a massively used one.) Without a MAC, any requests to an IT department would just get a blank stare - they dole out dynamic and static IP's by the hundreds, per hour. No way they're gonna be physically able to cooperate without that all-important MAC. Which of course just bolsters your point - it shouldn't be visible to the rest of the cloud, but it is.
RJB's site is not meant to be technically inclined, but slash dot is, of course. They've discussed this facet time and again, and so far as I can tell, no one has come up with a good reason why the above is true. I'll not get into any debate about that one, it's enough for me to know that I'm probably so far under their radar that I can safely find and d/l Duke Ellington's "Caravan" without too much fear.

Oddysey
