Poll: Why don't you write filters for proxomitron?
This poll is closed.
I don't know HTML code, neither proxomitron expressions 58.33% 7 58.33%
I don't have ideas for creating filters 0% 0 0%
I don't have time for these things 8.33% 1 8.33%
I wrote some filters but didn't post them 33.33% 4 33.33%
With Adblock plus and NoScript (or similars) i don't need anything more 0% 0 0%
Total 12 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Post Reply 
[Poll] Why don't you write filters for proxomitron?
Nov. 29, 2008, 03:53 PM
Post: #13
RE: [Poll] Why don't you write filters for proxomitron?
lnminente Wrote:Is very reccomendable the use of $NEST() and $STOP().

I use $NEST quite a bit. However, it can get confused in scripts.
I've had problems matching tags in js whether it's a $NESTed match or not.
Matching anything in js is a PITA.

For this reason, as a test, I am switching some of my html script matching filters to this:
Code:
<script(\s|>)*</script >

This seems to work better than $NEST on html pages.
Technically, any </ should signify the end of a script on a html page.
In practice, this only seems to hold true when it's a closing script tag.
That's why a closing script tag "inside" html js is always obscured.
Of course, if it's $TYPE(js) page, all matching bets are off.

So far, it's solved some problem matches and not caused any issues.
Time will tell.

z12
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [Poll] Why don't you write filters for proxomitron? - z12 - Nov. 29, 2008 03:53 PM

Forum Jump: