Beta Config (Sep 19 2010)

[wammie]

(Oct. 01, 2010 06:24 PM)sidki3003 Wrote:  Pardon me?

As a pure consumer, i.e. requesting free support for free software, without contributing anything, telling me what i ought to do or what not, appears slightly off the road to me. Main point being here that such a judgement obviously requires some insight, i.e. involvement.

Something's been misinterpreted, somewhere. This was not meant to be a directive, and I don't understand how this is "off the road," at all. I always thought that discussions of beta software were usually where consumers ask questions, report apparent issues, and make suggestions for a final release. Isn't that the whole purpose? With my admittedly very limited understanding of the coding, I was just observing that 99% of folks seem not to use the SSL feature, and the OOB configuration seems to bring up errors for those who have not made the adjustments to use SSL. All I'd require in response was an explanation that my observation was incorrect, and why that is. As far as involvement, I've been running beta versions and testing for trouble, reporting issues, and therefore involved. I was not inferring that the default SSL configuration has not been considered, but just reporting what I experienced and trying to help with advancing this software.