ProxHTTPSProxyMII: Development

[JJoe]

(Jul. 07, 2014 08:38 AM)whenever Wrote:  Have you ever considered using Markdown

I must have read about this but I don't remember it well enough to have consider it. It may explain the formating of some documents that I have read tho.

The idea of image and explanation sharing the same screen has grown on me. Hope it displayed correctly for you. Figured, I'd clean up the html later. Probably should have posted screen captures instead.


  py1.png (Size: 85.57 KB / Downloads: 780)

  py3.png (Size: 74.89 KB / Downloads: 747)

(Jul. 07, 2014 08:38 AM)whenever Wrote:  Do you think the proxy need a black list function, or just let Proxomitron handle it?

The Proxomitron can block while in bypass mode (not documented), so it may not need a black list feature in ProxHTTPSProxy. However, other proxies (Bfilter, Proximodo, Privoxy, Polipo, HandyCache, and ???) may also be able to use ProxHTTPSProxy. I don't know their current abilities. Proximodo never worked for me.

I know that the original goal was to help the Proxomitron but why not add others? Especially if there is little extra work required.
The documents are being formatted so that other proxies can be added.

Is the feature easy to add with little overhead?

Not asking for new features because ProxHTTPSProxyMII has probably already taken more of your time than expected. However, should you see a quick, easy, and reasonable way to add a custom header to tag files that have been clicked on or actually requested by the user... please share.

BTW, my spare time (probably days of it) has been assigned to a vehicle in need of many repairs and free labor.