sidki's config set: 2005-06-09

[z12]

Hi sidki

Your fix for cnet looks ok to me, I've used a fix similar to what I posted earlier and had no ill effects. I think its an oversight on their part that the div is in there to begin with.

The remark I made about removing large chunks of code was just in general, I have nothing particular in mind. What made me wonder about it was the cnet div problem and the Count list. I haven't had the time yet to investigate how your using the Count list in detail, but I wondered if you weren't using it for checking tag closure. I based this on the code you posted for testing the Count List. It seems like a very interesting & useful method.

Quote:Cool! If it's getting too quiet there, try turning on the "Use Debug Mode" header switch.

lol, no way am I ready for that yet. Actually, I was hoping to disable the js css comment filters to eliminate even more matches from the log window. I really do run with my log window open all the time, just to keep an eye on things. The first time I used your config, I was a bit overwhelmed, as I am used to my config which tends to be quiet. I wish proxo had the ability to select which filters would show in the log window, but oh well.

As far as protecting remarks in js css, those filters caught my eye since I was getting a lot of matches for a filter that, at first glance, looks like it doesn't do anything. I understand it's to prevent other filters from acting when you don't want them to, but I couldn't help but wonder if the same technique used for marking html tags couldn't be used here as well. The main advantage would be a quiet log since the latter tag matching method is designed to fail.

On a unrelated topic, I've added a few extra caching filters to the config. Basically they are filters I've been running for some time, modified for your config. They seem to be working well, but I'm not 100% sure that I've got the right switches in the url match for enabling/disabling the filter based on the cache control method that is selected early in the config. Anyway, I was thinking of posting them to have you look them over to see what you thought.

Your config seems to be working very well for me. I must admit that I think I spend more time looking at the filters than I do surfing.

Mike