Thread Closed 
We need Sidki back...
Jul. 17, 2008, 12:12 AM
Post: #3
RE: We need Sidki back...
ProxRocks wrote, please post those issues here...

== Where? I don't see a link.

ps - CC doesn't "want" your IP...

== I don't agree at all. Companies love information. It's worth $$.

"forcing" a log-in and NOT allowing 'anonymizers'

== Forcing a log-in? I don't get it. I had/have a CC account and couldn't post with an anonymous IP address.

(be careful, i could EASILY set up an "anonymizer" server and LOG YOUR EVERY MOVE, do you "really" TRUST the people running those anonymizer servers?)

== Yeah, you've got a good point there ProxRocks, but it's a risk some folks are willing to take. For example, the Christian who feels homosexuality is immoral and a sin and speaks up about it. Apparently, in our politically charged and politically correct culture, honesty itself is now out of bounds. People debating in forums all over the Internet are seraching for ways to protect their privacy so they can speak up for what is right. Many citizens are opting for Anonymizers. Do you have any other suggestions?

is merely the BEST way to keep out the SPAM posts (of which this web site has an occasional problem with, but much better of late)...

== I emailed the owner of CC and he didn't mention anything about keeping away SPAM. He just said we had to use our real IP address or we could not post. No reason for it. It was really poor customer service. That was enough for me to say goodbye. I'll take my business elsewhere. It's sad because he's missing out on alot more hits to his website and revenue. For instance, I would post there and I know other people who would too.

me personally, if i hosted any sites such as this, i would NOT allow "guests" to post and would NOT allow "anonymizers"...

== I'm surprised you would say that. I've read your posts for a long time and I was under the impression you valued privacy. If you're so woried about the SPAM find another way to block it as opposed to making honest people who only want a little privacy pay for the SPAMMERS crime.

it's got NOTHING to do with "wanting" IP addresses, it's got EVERYTHING to do with keeping the riff-raff OUT...

=== Er, okay. You have a right to your opinion, but I think that's bolshevik.

hmm, i wonder how many "anonymizer" servers are GOVERNMENT- OWNED!!! seriously, "think about it"...

== Read above. Thanks.
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 15, 2008, 05:39 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 16, 2008, 12:07 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Guest - Jul. 17, 2008 12:12 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 17, 2008, 11:24 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 17, 2008, 05:52 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 17, 2008, 12:14 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 17, 2008, 06:41 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Ralph - Jul. 18, 2008, 12:13 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 18, 2008, 06:02 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 18, 2008, 06:13 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Guest - Jul. 19, 2008, 12:05 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 19, 2008, 12:09 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 19, 2008, 01:25 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 19, 2008, 03:48 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - ProxRocks - Jul. 19, 2008, 02:04 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 19, 2008, 07:06 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Oddysey - Jul. 20, 2008, 03:42 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - apacallyps - Jul. 20, 2008, 05:38 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Guest - Jul. 19, 2008, 09:10 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - besafe - Jul. 20, 2008, 02:22 AM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Guest - Jul. 20, 2008, 07:57 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Guest - Jul. 20, 2008, 08:18 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Ralph - Jul. 21, 2008, 01:26 PM
RE: We need Sidki back... - Oddysey - Jul. 21, 2008, 06:23 PM

Forum Jump: