sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
|
Jan. 14, 2009, 02:04 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Hi all, here is beta 2 of the next config.
ReadMe Wrote:This config should work with all Gecko Browsers, IE clones > 5.5, Opera > 6.x BetaNotes Wrote:This beta will use its own subdirectory, so you can run both, this and the ReadMe - Beta Config (offsite link, 290 KB) - Online FAQ - Homepage Have fun sidki |
|||
Jan. 14, 2009, 03:52 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Testing right away!!!
Thank you Sidki for coming back! |
|||
Jan. 14, 2009, 04:16 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2 | |||
Jan. 14, 2009, 10:06 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Installed the beta this morning and have been running all day, no problems, on Linux w/Firefox 3.0.5. So far all's well. Thanks much Sidki!
|
|||
Jan. 15, 2009, 09:43 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Hi Sidki,
thank you!.....and glad to see you back to maintain this excellent filter set! Max |
|||
Jan. 15, 2009, 12:43 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Just great Sidke ! Works perfectly . Many thanks to you and to those who have helped .
|
|||
Jan. 15, 2009, 04:04 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Hi Sidki,
Your new beta set is working fine on IE8 RC1! Many Thanks, DarthTrader |
|||
Jan. 15, 2009, 04:36 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Thanks guys for the feedback!
Good to hear that it works in Linux and with IE8. (Jan. 15, 2009 09:43 AM)UPieper Wrote: Hi Sidki, Welcome! Took me awhile to relate your new nick to the right Y!G one (same with Toppy earlier). |
|||
Jan. 16, 2009, 10:11 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Thanks very much, Sidki and other contributors.
For the first time in a while, I can now disable Adblock Plus and return to just using Prox. Several months ago, I pretty much stopped using your last config from a year ago, out of concerns the ad blocking was increasingly out of date. Not that it appeared to be _that_ bad anyway. Of late I have mainly been using Prox just as a browser proxy to run JJoe's Y!Login script. (probably still available in the Yahoo group's files) I suspect this new config will have a slow take up, seeing as many users may now be ex-users and might not be familiar with this site. However, I'm sure word will get out. Lee |
|||
Jan. 16, 2009, 04:30 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
(Jan. 16, 2009 10:11 AM)leecovuk Wrote: Several months ago, I pretty much stopped using your last config from a year ago, out of concerns the ad blocking was increasingly out of date. Not that it appeared to be _that_ bad anyway. So you apparently know that, from an objective point of view, this is utter nonsense. The backbone of this config are generic filters which are supposed to also handle future filter-worthy code. I assume that even the last release version, 2007, is a usable config. Although you'd probably need to disable many site-specific filters. Quote:I suspect this new config will have a slow take up, seeing as many users may now be ex-users and might not be familiar with this site. Yes, not that many people used to know about prxbx.com (perhaps because this name is a little hard to articulate ). There's a thread at GRC News and at DSLR now, so daily downloads go up a bit. |
|||
Jan. 16, 2009, 05:14 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
(Jan. 16, 2009 04:30 PM)sidki3003 Wrote: So you apparently know that, from an objective point of view, this is utter nonsense. Not ever properly understanding how Prox and your configs work, I found my list of entries in the bypass list was growing and I 'concluded' I was better off reducing the impact of Prox in favour of Adblock Plus and No Script. People here are very helpful but it seems unreasonable and excessive to ask for help on every little thing that may crop up. I don't mean to sound negative, but it's a shame the explanations of _all_ the filters has never been completed as a full doc, so mere users like me could fully grasp what they all do. It would also be great if the Prox Menu (via the little green on-page icon) was much more flexible and user -friendly. It's certainly good though, to have this new config from you, so thanks again. Lee |
|||
Jan. 16, 2009, 05:25 PM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
(Jan. 16, 2009 05:14 PM)leecovuk Wrote: it's a shame the explanations of all the filters has never been completed as a full doc personally, this is an IMPOSSIBLE task... utterly IMPOSSIBLE !!! no offense, but i wish people would quit pointing a "finger of blame" at 'documentation' until they themselves even "attempted" the sort of DAUNTING task they request... my two cents... |
|||
Jan. 17, 2009, 01:56 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Hello ProxRocks,
It would be a lengthy task now, yes, but I do feel a useful one for non-technical users. I'm not trying to come over as all bitter or complaining, by the way, so sorry if my tone is coming through worse in text than it actually is. I'm pleased to have an updated Sidki config set! Lee |
|||
Jan. 17, 2009, 02:14 AM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
it's not a bad idea, honestly, it isn't...
just extremely time consuming... how many "volunteers" can we gather to compile such a beast? i'm thinking if we can gather enough comrades, a filter-by-filter doc can indeed be generated and would be very helpful... i pre-release beta-test for sidki once in a while, before beta releases become "public"... i sat down once to compile such a doc, it's an 'impossible' task for "one" person to do... imo... now, it would be cool, fantastic, awesome, if a "group" of people were to sit down and come up with something... keep in mind, the "un-off. proxo forum" has an agenda to be a COMMUNITY of config support... relying on 'just a few' to do all the legwork is way too much weight for any given set of legs... |
|||
Jan. 17, 2009, 02:28 AM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE: sidki-config: Jan 14 2009 beta 2
Sure, yes, I for example am / would be willing but I would need to be correctly taught what lots of the filters do first! I'm not saying that as some kind of lame excuse to gleefully continue leeching.
Lee |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|