Adjusting privoxy

[rogern]

In my language the word advarer is triggering privoxy to block the page(article).
Where can i allow that word?

[Faxopita]

This exception rule:

Code:

{ -block }
.advarer.
/.*advarer

To unblock any domain and path (from root folder) built around.

Simplest approach: place it somewhere inside the user.action file, which should always be the last file to be parsed by Privoxy; see config file.

[rogern]

It seems to be OK ,now i know where i can make exeptions for my language.

But why do i get this error from the proxHTTPS?

I know it is another question but instead of creating a new i ask here

Code:

HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=8118): Max retries exceeded

[Faxopita]

Does this message prevent you to filter HTTPS connections anyway? I also have this message, but none of them are related to localhost. It's only for certain websites. For example, this one. I'm surprised you have that kind of message as well for localhost. Here's what it's returned by ProxHTTPSProxy in my case when visiting the website:

Code:

502: HTTPError

The following error occurred while trying to access https://www.infoworld.com/article/3023422/security/why-you-dont-need-an-rfid-blocking-wallet.html

HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.infoworld.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /article/3023422/security/why-you-dont-need-an-rfid-blocking-wallet.html (Caused by NewConnectionError(': Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 60] Operation timed out',))

Generated on 2016-01-26 09:41:45.125899 by ProxHTTPSProxyMII RearProxy/v1.4.

In fact, I can't access that website. I would need to make an exception, and hence making Privoxy not able to filter the website. Sometimes (often), a website is faulty in implementing correctly the SSL configuration. Fortunately, this problem only happens occasionally while I wander the web. I would simply try to visit another website discussing this topic.

In order to help you solve your problem, I invite you to visit this Stack Exchange thread. Same issue raised over here as well.

In last resort, I suggest you move this topic to the ProxHTTPSProxy forum section.